<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rube Reality &#187; Pelosi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rubereality.com/tag/pelosi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rubereality.com</link>
	<description>Ruminations of an unrepentant rube</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:47:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Tis the Season &#8211; For Spending!</title>
		<link>http://rubereality.com/2009/12/18/tis-the-season-for-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://rubereality.com/2009/12/18/tis-the-season-for-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Herk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rubereality.com/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of last minute surprises from the jerks in D.C.: Obama signed a $1.1 trillion spending bill The House approved a $155 billion jobs bill: I guess the stimulus package wasn&#8217;t enough to create jobs, so spend yourself further into debt, it&#8217;s the American way! The House raised the debt ceiling by $290 billion to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of last minute surprises from the jerks in D.C.:</p>
<ul>
<li>Obama signed a $1.1 trillion <a title="Obama signs $1.1 trillion spending bill into law" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091216/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_spending_bill" target="_blank">spending bill</a></li>
<li>The House approved a $155 billion <a title="US House approves $155 billion jobs bill" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1612851020091217" target="_blank">jobs bill</a>: I guess the stimulus package wasn&#8217;t enough to create jobs, so spend yourself further into debt, it&#8217;s the American way!</li>
<li>The House <a title="House approves $290 billion increase in debt limit" href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091216/D9CKL24O0.html" target="_blank">raised the debt ceiling</a> by $290 billion to finance six more weeks of spending: A $12.1 trillion debt limit, really, how quaint! And $290 billion over six weeks? C&#8217;mon Big Daddy-O, that&#8217;s not an allowance, it&#8217;s a pittance!</li>
</ul>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s $1.1 trillion spent, with another $445 billion, in just one day. Does <em>anyone</em> even notice anymore?</p>
<ul>
<li>Pelosi hasn&#8217;t even done a full year&#8217;s work, and she&#8217;s already <a title="Pelosi: 'I'm in campaign mode'" href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/72561-pelosi-im-in-campaign-mode" target="_blank">in campaign mode</a>: Has she ever left it in her political life?</li>
<li>The Senate Banking Committee rubber-stamped <a title="Senate panel approves Bernanke nomination" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BG3HU20091217" target="_blank">Ben Bernanke for another term</a>: What intelligent statesman that committee has! Apparently, 16-to-7 is &#8220;<span id="articleText">an unusual amount of opposition from lawmakers who are disgruntled over the Fed&#8217;s bailout of financial firms.&#8221;</span></li>
<li><a title="Obama, Medvedev may get arms deal &quot;in principle&quot;" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BH08V20091218" target="_blank">Obama, Medvedev may get arms deal &#8220;in principle&#8221;</a>: Yes, Reuters actually ran the story with exactly that headline. I guess an arms deal &#8220;in principle&#8221; is supposed to be meaningful, but does a deal &#8220;in principle&#8221; lower nuclear stockpiles &#8220;in reality&#8221;? No, I didn&#8217;t think so.</li>
</ul>
<p>Apparently, spending ridiculous amounts of money is the only thing that can be performed with any efficiency or effect there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rubereality.com/2009/12/18/tis-the-season-for-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

